Accès gratuit
Numéro
Orthod Fr
Volume 80, Numéro 1, Mars 2009
81e réunion scientifique de la S.F.O.D.F.
Page(s) 33 - 46
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr:2008027
Publié en ligne 28 mars 2009
  1. Aknin C. Fracture strength of ceramic bracket during arch wire torsion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:22–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander C, Viazis A, Nakajima H. Bond strengths and fracture of three orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:207–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amoric M. Quels brackets pour demain ? Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 2003;37:395-406. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arici S, Minors C. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:327–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atsü SS, Gelgör IE, Sahin V. Effects of silica coating and silane surface conditioning on the bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to enamel. Angle Orthod 2006;76:857–862. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Azzeh E, Feldon PJ. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets : a comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:79–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergé M. À propos des boîtiers orthodontiques en céramique. Scientifique ODF 1990;177:29–30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Birnie D. Orthodontic materials update, ceramic brackets. Br J Orthop 1990;17:71–75. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bishara S, Trulove T. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study, part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:145–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bishara S, Trulove T. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study, part II: findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:263–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bishara S, Olsen M, Von Wald L. Évaluation des caractéristiques de dépose d'un nouveau bracket céramique fracturable. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop (Ed. Française) 1998;55–62. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bishara SE, Ostbyb AW, Laffoonc J, Warrend JJ. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. Angle Orthod 2008;78:1078–1083. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brouns EMM, Schopf PM, Kocjancic B. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets. An in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:115–123. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Decker A, Sadoun M. Un bracket céramique en zircone. Inf Dent 1989;41:4009–4015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Eliades T, Viazis AD, Eliades G. Bonding of ceramic brackets to enamel : morphologic and structural considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;99:369–375. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eliades T, Viazis AD, Lekka M. Failure mode analysis of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:10–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Forsberg CM, Hagberg C. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention. Br J Orthod 1992;19:183–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ghafari J, Skanchy TL, Mante F. Shear bond strenghts of two ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:491–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iwamoto H, Kawamoto T, Kinoshita Z. Bond strength of new ceramic brackets as studied in vitro. J Dent Res 1987;6:928. [Google Scholar]
  20. Karamongos A, Athanosion AE, Papadopoulos AM. Clinical characteristics and properties of ceramic brackets. A comprehensive review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:34–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kearns HP, Sandham JA, Bryan Jones W. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: An ex vivo study. Br J Orthod 1997;24:237–242. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kusy R. Morphology of polycrystalline aluminum brackets and its relationship to fracture toughness and strength. Angle Orthod 1988;58:197–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kusy R. Le futur des matériaux orthodontiques, vue à long terme. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:91–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laino A, Cacciafesta V. Les attaches orthodontiques en céramique : analyse morphostructurale au microscope électronique ; forces d'arrachement in vitro ; recyclage thermo-ultrasonique. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1995;29:47-73. [Google Scholar]
  25. Larmour CJ, Mccbe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo investigation into the effects of chemical solvents on the debond behaviour of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1998;25:35-39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lepetit FX. À propos des attaches en céramique. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1988;22:197-199. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Le Romain B. Trois ans d'utilisation des attaches en céramique. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1990;24:341–357. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Le Romain B. La réutilisation des attaches en céramique. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1991;25:499–505. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lew K, Djeng S. Recycling ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:499–505. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lew K, Chew CL, Lee KW. A comparison of shear bond strength between new and recycled ceramic brackets. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:306–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Loreille JP. Corrosion et concétoires, comment améliorer le glissement fil/brackets. Orthod Fr 2002;73:71–81. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maskeroni A, Meyers C, Lorton L. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of bond strength with polyacrylic acid and phosphoric acid enamel bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:168–175. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Matasa CG. Tendances dans les biomatériaux orthodontiques, métaux et céramiques. Orthod Fr 2000;71:335–341. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Morin-Lemoine C. Comparaison de la force de collage d'attaches céramiques et métalliques : tests in vitro. Certificat d'études cliniques spéciales mention orthodontie 2005;8–26. [Google Scholar]
  35. Philippe J. Vers des appareils non visibles. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1986;20(3):12–20. [Google Scholar]
  36. Redd TB, Shibvapuja PK. Debonding ceramic bracket : effects on enamel. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:475–481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reicheneder CA, Baunert U, Gedrange T, Preff P, Faltermeier A, Muessing D. Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:359–365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Russell JS. Aesthetic orthodontic bracket. J Orthod 2005;32:146–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Spiro J, Chaconas J. Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems. Angle Orthod 1993;61:35–42. [Google Scholar]
  40. Stratmann U, Schaarschmidt K, Wegener H, Ehmer U. The extend of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermal debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal bracket by energy dispersive micro and image analysis. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:655–662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Strobl K, Bahns TL, Willham L, Bishara SE, Stwalley WC. Laser aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:152-158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schwarz M. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:82–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tocchio RM, Williams PT, Mayer FJ, Standing KG. Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:155–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Viazis AD, Delong R, Bevis RR, Rudney JD, Pintado MR. Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:103–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Winchester LJ. Bond strenght of five different brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:293-305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Winchester LJ. Aesthetic Brackets, to perfect or to reject. Dental Update 1992; April:107–114. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.