Accès gratuit
Numéro
Orthod Fr
Volume 80, Numéro 1, Mars 2009
81e réunion scientifique de la S.F.O.D.F.
Page(s) 87 - 96
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2008032
Publié en ligne 28 mars 2009
  1. Altounian G. Collage orthodontique aux verres ionomères : de la théorie à la pratique. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 2000;34:557–600. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849–853. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burdairon G. Abrége de biomatériaux dentaires. Paris: Masson, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Tagliani P, Klersy C. In Vitro fluoride release rates from 9 orthodontic bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:656–662. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chalgren R, Combe EC, Wahl AJ. Effects of etchants and primers on shear bond strength of a self-ligating esthetic orthodontic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:577–585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Degrange M, Tirlet G. Scellement et collage. Les Cahiers de Prothèse 1995;92:27–45. [Google Scholar]
  7. Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding: A study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod 1981;79:500–522. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Driessens FCM. Chemical adhesion in dentistry. Int Dent J 1977;27:317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, Mokas M. Eamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding method. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:333–338. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Faltermeier A, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Reicheneder C, Müssig D. An in vitro comparative assessment of different enamel contaminants during bracket bonding. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:559–563. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guess MB, Watanabe LG, Beck FM, Crall MG. The effect of silane coupling agents on the bond strength of a polycrystalline ceramic bracket. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:788–792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hagger O. Swiss patent 1951;278,946;British patent 687–299. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hitmi L, Attal JP, Degrange M. Influence du traitement de surface de l'émail sur les caractéristiques énergétiques de la surface. J Edgewise 2000;41:89–104. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hitmi L, Muller C, Roussarie F, Attal JP. Le collage des brackets en orthodontie. Clinic 2001;22:165–179. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hitmi L, Attal JP, Degrange M. Les différentes familles de colles composites: Présentation et expérimentation. Orthod Fr 2002;73:39–58. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hogervorst W, Feilzer AJ, Anderson BP. The air abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: A quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparaison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:20–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karan S, Büyükyilmaz T, Toroglu MS. Orthodontic bonding to several ceramic surfaces: are there acceptable alternatives to conventional methods? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:144–157. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lavernhe P, Lodter C, Sharrock P, Grégoire G. Biocompatibilité des colles orthodontiques : l'apport des ciments aux verres ionomères. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 2000;34:539–554. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lill DJ, Lindauer SJ, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B. Importance of pumice prophylaxis for bonding with self-etch primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:423–426. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mattick CR, Hobson RS. A comparative micro-topographic study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. Br J Orthod 2000;27:143–148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Millet DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, Robertson M, Love J. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod 1998;68:351–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Montasser MA, Drummond JL, Roth JR, Al-Turki L, Evans CA. Rebonding of orthodontic brackets – Part 2, an XPS and SEM study. Angle Orthod 2008;78:537–544. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments. Progress report. Am J Orthod 1965;51:901–912. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roos S. Évolution du collage en orthodontie : apport des adhésifs auto-mordançants. Int Orthod;3:141–154. [Google Scholar]
  25. Roulet JF, Degrange M. Collage et adhésion, la révolution silencieuse. Quintessence International, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sarac YS, Elekdag-Turk S, Sarac D, Turk T. Surface conditioning methods and polishing techniques effect on surface roughness of a feldspar ceramic. Angle Orthod 2007;77:723–728. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shinya M, Shinya A, Lassila LV, Gomi H, Varrela J, Vallittu PK, Shinya A. Treated enamel surface patterns associated with five orthodontic adhesive systems, surface morphology and shear bond strength. Dent Mater J 2008;27:1–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon IL, Fejerskov O.Verstone LM. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examinated by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Caries Research 1975;9:373–387. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sorel O, Cathelineau G. Influence des interfaces de collage sur l'adhésion des brackets. Orthod Fr 2001;72:305–312. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Swartz ML. Le collage en orthodontie. Int Orthodontics 2008;1:23–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Noort R. Principles of adhesion. In: Van Noort (ed). Dental materials. London: Mosby, 1994:61–71. [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Noort R. An overview of the clinical use of resin-to-metal bonding. In Roulet JF, Vanherle G. Adhesive technology for restorative dentistry. Quintessence Publishing 2005:153–169. [Google Scholar]
  33. Youn YA, Lee YK, Lee DY, Kim NY, Lim YK. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on the retentive strength of orthodontic bands on gold alloy crowns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:728–736. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.