Accès gratuit
Numéro
Orthod Fr
Volume 83, Numéro 1, Mars 2012
84e réunion scientifique de la S.F.O.D.F.
Orthodontie 3D : repoussez les limites
Page(s) 23 - 36
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2012002
Publié en ligne 29 mars 2012
  1. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH, Attarzadeh F. Porion and condyle as cephalometric landmarks – An error Study. Am J Orthod Orthofacial Orthop 1988;94:411–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahlqvist J, Eliasson S, Welander U. The effect of projection errors on angular measurements in cephalometry. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:353–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arponen H, Elf H, Evalahti M, Waltimo-Siren J. Reliability of cranial base measurements on lateral skull radiographs. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008;11:201–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumrind S, Frantz R. The reliability of head film measurements: 1, Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60:111–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumrind S, Frantz R. The reliability of head film measurements: 2, Conventional angular and linear measurements. Am J Orthod 1971;60:505–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Björk A. The face in profile. An anthropological X-ray investigation on Swedish children and conscripts. Svenska Tandlakare-Tidskrist 1947;40:5B. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourriau J, Cabot I, Foucart JM. Téléradiographie. Encyclopédie Médico Chirurgicale, Odonto/Stomatologie, Paris : Elsevier ; 1999, 23-455-E-10, 9 p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its applications to orthodontics. Angle Orthodontist 1931;1:45–66. [Google Scholar]
  9. Broch J, Slagsvold O, Rosler M. Error in landmark identification in lateral radiograph head plates. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:9–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen AM. Uncertainty in cephalometrics. Br J Orthod 1984;11:44–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook PA, Gravely JF. Tracing errors with Björk’s mandibular structures. Angle Orthod 1988;58:169–178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Foster TD, Howat AP, Naish PJ. Variation in cephalometric reference lines. Br J Orthod 1981;8:183–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M, Hansson LG. Reproductibilty of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storagephosphore technique. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:331–340. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hägg U, Cooke MS, Chan TC, Tng TT, Lau PY. The reproductibility of cephalometric landmarks : an experimental study on skulls. Aust Orthod J 1998;15:177–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haynes S, Chau MN. Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:79–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382–390. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hsiao TH, Chang HP, Liu KM. A method of magnification correction for posteroanterior radiographic cephalometry. Angle Orthod 1997;67:137–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:569–578. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Caltabiano M. Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography cephalometric radiography. Angle Orthod 2008;78:761–765. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lim KF, Foong KWC. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification. Br J Orthod 1997;24:301–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Macri V, Wenzel A. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:137–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Midtgard J, Bjork A, Linder-Aronson S. Reproductibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod 1974;44:56–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pancherz H, Gökbuget K. The reliability of the Franckfort horizontal in roentgenographic cephalometry. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:367–372. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Richardson A. An investigation into the reproductibility of some points, planes and lines used in cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod 1966;52:637–651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Savage AW, Showfety KJ, Yancey J. Reapeted measures analysis of geometrically constructed and directly determined cephalometric points. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:295–299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Savara RS, Tracey WE, Miller PA. Analysis of error in cephalometrics measurements of three dimensional distances on the human mandibule. Arch Oral Biol 1966;11:209–217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Seki K, Okano T. Exposure reduction in cephalometry with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;22:127–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Spolyar JL. Head positioning error in cephalometric radiology. Angle Orthod 1987;57:77–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stabrun AE, Danielsen K. Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:185–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Trpkova B, Major P, Prasad N, Nebbe B. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproductibility: a meta analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:165–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vincent AM., West VC. Cephalometric landmark identification error. Aust Orthod J 1987;10:98–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wah PY, Cooke MS, Hagg U. Effects of training and experience on cephalometric measurement errors on surgical patients. Int J Adult Orthodont Orthognat Surg 1997;12:204–213. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoon YJ, Kim DH, Yu PS, Kim HJ, Choi EH, Kim KW. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 2002;72:36–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.